Does the runtime environment contain known vulnerabilities or insecure settings?

Before an agent goes live,
make security risks visible
At key points such as agent deployment, tool admission, and version changes, proactively assess runtime environments, inputs and outputs, agent configurations, SKILL, MCP, and related dependencies. Produce risk evidence, remediation recommendations, and retesting conclusions to inform deployment and admission decisions.
Before an agent goes live,
check more than the model
Agents connect to runtime environments, models, tools, skills, MCP services, and external services. Problems with configuration, permissions, code, or data handling at any point can enter real business environments as tasks run.
Could agent inputs or outputs be attacked or expose sensitive information?
Do configuration, permissions, and call relationships exceed intended boundaries?
Do connected SKILL, MCP services, or dependencies introduce malicious code, excessive access, or supply-chain risks?
Assess the key elements on which agents depend
Define one assessment scope around agents and their runtime relationships, combining black-box, white-box, and other applicable methods according to target conditions.
External environment security assessment
Check the agent environment and related components for vulnerabilities, insecure settings, exposed services, and dependency risks that may affect operation.
Model, input, and output security assessment
Assess prompt attacks, jailbreaks, context manipulation, abnormal outputs, and sensitive information leakage to verify input and output boundaries.
Agent configuration security assessment
Check role settings, permissions, tool call conditions, credential use, and critical parameters for errors, excessive permissions, and unclear boundaries.
SKILL security assessment
Analyze code, commands, permissions, data handling, and dependencies in SKILL to find malicious behavior, dangerous operations, unauthorized access, and supply-chain risks.
MCP security assessment
Check MCP service descriptions, interfaces, configurations, permissions, parameters, data handling, and dependencies for untrusted services, unauthorized calls, and data exposure.
Plan centrally, execute collaboratively, track continuously
The system plans tasks around assessment targets, coordinates assessment specialists through task monitoring, and consolidates risk evidence into a report.
Task planning
Define scope, plans, and execution dependencies based on assessment targets, object relationships, and available conditions. Dispatch tasks after user confirmation.
Task monitoring
Track tasks, subtasks, and dependencies, and consolidate progress, exceptions, and interim findings.
Specialist execution
Dispatch specialists in environment, configuration, input and output, SKILL, and MCP assessment according to the target, and record risk evidence.
Report generation
Consolidate affected objects, severity, location, impact, evidence, and remediation recommendations into a security testing report.
Give every risk evidence, disposition, and a retest
Findings should show what was discovered and retain affected objects, evidence, and disposition, providing a traceable basis for deployment review, tool admission, and version retesting.
Security testing report
Summarize assessment scope, execution, findings, and disposition in a record that can be updated over time.
Critical checks before agents enter real business environments
Pre-deployment security assessment
Check environments, configurations, inputs and outputs, and tool risks before agents enter production or real business environments.
Agent configuration audit
Check permissions, credentials, tool call conditions, and critical settings when creating, modifying, or migrating an agent.
SKILL and MCP admission assessment
Check code, permissions, interfaces, data handling, and dependency risks before connecting new tools, skills, or MCP services.
Version changes and ongoing retesting
Reassess agents, tools, configurations, or dependencies after significant changes to identify new and residual risks.
Integrate proactive assessment into existing security processes
The system can be deployed privately according to enterprise conditions and connected through controlled interfaces to agent platforms and existing asset, security, and workflow systems. Components, models, computing resources, network conditions, and integration scope depend on project assessment.
system
Complete a verifiable security assessment before agents go live
Tell us which agents, tools, or version changes need assessment and which environment and interface conditions are available. We can discuss the scope and implementation.